Everywhere we turn we are
being asked to “follow” or “like” something on social media. We all understand
that the more “likes” a site gets, the more “Google juice”—higher search ranking—it
gets. Companies hope that higher search rankings will help them achieve business
objectives. Our likes, follows, and other electronic activities allow profiles
to be built on us by anyone from marketers to employers to government agencies.
In return for sharing
information, our searches are optimized or we are given things. More
importantly, we are given the opportunity to offer personal opinions on
everything from politics to products.
Recently, language has
appeared in the terms and condition statements of many websites—even service
contracts—stipulating that any negative statements made by users or their
associates, anywhere on the Internet, will incur monetary charges. What used to
be “likes only, please” has become “likes only, or pay the price.”
Igor Stevanovic/iStock/Thinkstock |
I recently came across an article in the British media in which a general-practitioner
surgery facility requested that all comments be directed to the administrator
and not be posted on social media. A sign to that effect was even displayed in
the waiting room. I wonder how long it will be before that same language makes
it onto the hospital’s consent form? And how long will it take for the practice
to “cross the pond” to the United States and other countries?
Have we indeed come so far
that we have to pay if we express a negative opinion about what is truly bad
service or an inferior product? I have searched Facebook high and low. Can anyone
tell me where that darn “unlike” button is?
No comments:
Post a Comment